Bensfield v. Murray et al
Deborah Elizabeth Bensfield |
Deputy Murray, Deputy Nard, Deputy Hocker, Cpl. Lane and Cpt. Moore |
4:2021cv00104 |
October 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Joseph H McKinley |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE Signed by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. (EBOC) on 10/22/2021 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is required to the pay the statutory filing fee of $350 under an installment plan. The Daviess County Detention Center shall collect from Plaintiff's prison trust account the $350 filing fee (*see Order for specific content). Clerk is directed to open an account for the payment of the filing fee in this action. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Finance USDC KYWD; DCDC, Attn: Inmate Accts.(EAS) |
Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Deborah Elizabeth Bensfield. (MNM) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Deborah Elizabeth Bensfield. (MNM) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley Jr. (MNM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hocker, Lane, Moore, Murray, and Nard, filed by Deborah Elizabeth Bensfield. (Attachments: #1 Summons Tendered) (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.