Weatherspoon v. Spigel Properties LLC et al
| Wilma D. Weatherspoon |
| Spigel Properties LLC, Spigel Properties Laredo, Inc., Spigel Properties, Inc. and Audubon Village, LLC |
| 4:2023cv00006 |
| January 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| H Brent Brennenstuhl |
| Joseph H McKinley |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Wilma D. Weatherspoon. (Hanes, Caleb) |
| Filing 10 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Audubon Village, LLC, Spigel Properties LLC. (Klapheke, David) |
| Filing 9 Rule 7.1(a)(2) Disclosure Statement by Wilma D. Weatherspoon. (Hanes, Caleb) |
Filing 8
ORDER by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. (EBOC) on 1/24/2023: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/28/2023. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 3/17/2023 at 9:30 AM CDT before Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl.cc:counsel; CM-HBB (EAS)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and in accordance with Rule 73(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that a United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or non-jury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. You may consent to have your case referred to a Magistrate Judge, or you may withhold your consent without adverse consequences. Should all parties consent to having a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, please complete the #Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge and send a copy of this document to the clerks office via regular mail or email at # intake-kywECF@kywd.uscourts.gov. (EAS) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL LETTER sent to Henderson Circuit Court re #1 Notice of Removal. (DJT) |
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 1/17/23: This action is hereby REFERRED to the Honorable H. BRENT BRENNENSTUHL, United States Magistrate Judge, for determination of non-dispositive matters pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Said Magistrate is empowered to conduct any hearings necessary for their resolution. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc:counsel (DJT)
|
| Filing 4 Rule 7.1(a)(2) Disclosure Statement by Audubon Village, LLC, Spigel Properties LLC, Spigel Properties Laredo, Inc., Spigel Properties, Inc.. (DJT) |
| Filing 3 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Audubon Village, LLC, Spigel Properties LLC. (DJT) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (DJT) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL [ANSWER FILED] by Spigel Properties LLC, Spigel Properties, Inc., Audubon Village, LLC, Spigel Properties Laredo, Inc. from Henderson Circuit Court, case number 22-CI-00313. Filing fee $ 402; receipt number AKYWDC-3731670, filed by Spigel Properties LLC, Spigel Properties, Inc., Audubon Village, LLC, Spigel Properties Laredo, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Record) (DJT) |
| ANSWER with Jury Demand filed in State Court Case (22-CI-00313) see DN #1 -2 for full viewing by Audubon Village, LLC, Spigel Properties LLC. (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
