Curtis v. Hamby
Plaintiff: Lisa Curtis
Defendant: Cory Hamby
Case Number: 5:2012cv00013
Filed: February 1, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Paducah Office
County: Trigg
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Russell
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 9/16/2013; re 20 MOTION to for summary judgment filed by defendant; an appropriate order shall issuecc:counsel (KJA) Modified on 9/16/2013 to correct dn for motion (KJA).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Curtis v. Hamby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa Curtis
Represented By: Kenneth R. Haggard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cory Hamby
Represented By: Christian Matthew Feltner
Represented By: Roger G. Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?