Harbin v. Huddleston et al
| George Marion Harbin |
| Daniel Hines, Jamie Caraway, Hobert Huddleston, Larry Kramer and Daniel Woosley |
| 5:2013cv00150 |
| September 3, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Paducah Office |
| Lyon |
| Thomas B. Russell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 7/2/2014; the Court will GRANT Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment. An appropriate Order will issue concurrently with this Opinion.cc:counsel; Plaintiff George Marion Harbin, pro se (DAK)
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 5/21/2014; re 17 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies filed by Daniel Hines, Jimmy D. Key, Daniel Woosley, Jamie Caraway, Ella Mae Parrish, Hobert Huddleston, William Anderson, Gary Peters, Larry Cranor, Daniel Winsett ; a separate judgment shall issuecc:counsel (KJA)
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. Upon initial review, the Court will allow Plaintiff's allegations of denial of outdoor and indoor recreation to continue for further development against all Defendants in their individual capacities. Plaintiff's retaliation claim is DISMISSED. cc:Plaintiff, pro se; General Counsel, Justice & Public Safety Cabinet, Office of Legal Counsel (ERH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
