Alstatt et al v. Beshear et al
| Curtis E. Brown, Ivan W. Musgrove, Thomas W. Bunn, Ronald C. Fairchild, John D. Alstatt and Larry C. Vancleave |
| Shannon Jones, Jeff Burton, LaDonna Thompson, J. Michael Brown and Steven L. Beshear |
| 5:2013cv00180 |
| October 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Paducah Office |
| Fulton |
| Thomas B. Russell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell; Because it appears to this Court that Plaintiff has abandoned any interest in prosecution of this case, the Court will dismiss the case by separate Order. cc:Plaintiff, pro se (ERH)
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 11/19/13; IT IS ORDERED that the complaint will be SEVERED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 21. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to docket the instant civil action as being filed by John D. Alstatt a s the single plaintiff. All claims by purported Plaintiffs Ronald C. Fairchild, Curtis E. Brown, Larry C. Van Cleave, Thomas W. Bunn, and Ivan W. Musgrove are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate dismissed plaintiffs as parties to this action. cc:Plaintiff Alstate, pro se; Fairchild; Brown; Van Cleave; Bunn; Musgrove (ERH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
