Ford v. Batts et al
| Christopher Ford |
| Carey Batts, Ronnie Giles, Bobby Hickman, Ballard County Sheriff's Office and Brandon Harrison |
| 5:2017cv00094 |
| June 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Paducah Office |
| Ballard |
| Thomas B. Russell |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 8/29/2019. Granting 60 Motion for Summary Judgment. All claims against Carey Batts, Bobby Hickman and Ballard County are dismissed. Claims against Brandon Harrison remain before the Court. cc: Counsel, plaintiff pro se(KJA)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 6/15/2018. Granting 27 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant Ronnie Giles is dismissed. cc: Counsel, plaintiff pro se(KJA)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 2/15/2018. Defendant Ballard County added. Defendant Ballard County Sheriff's Office terminated. The Court will enter a separate Order to govern the development of these claims.cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendants (MNM)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 10/13/2017. Within 30 days of entry of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to Show Cause, Ford must submit to the Court in writing an explanation of why the motion in h is criminal case referred to the search as having taken place on August 26, 2015, yet in his complaint in this case Ford states that the search took place sometime in 2016 on a date not known to him and why sanctions should not be imposed agains t him under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. Plaintiff within the same 30-day period shall show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim as barred by the applicable one-year statute of limitations. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendants (CDR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
