McGranahan v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
| Joseph McGranahan |
| Kentucky Department of Corrections, Randy White, Jesse Coombs, Dan Smith, Rodriguez, Burnette, Larue and Rasmossen |
| 5:2018cv00037 |
| March 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Paducah Office |
| Lyon |
| Greg N. Stivers |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 8/6/2020 granting 33 Motion for Summary Judgment. A separate Judgment will be entered. cc: Plaintiff, pro se(MNM)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 7/31/2018. Randy White, Kentucky Department of Corrections and Dan Smith terminated. Within 30 days from the entry date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, Plaintiff may amend the complaint to sue Defendants Rodriguez, Burnette, Larue, and Rasmussen in their individual capacities and to describe the facts surrounding how each of those Defendants allegedly violated his rights. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to place the instan t case number and word Amended on a § 1983 complaint form and send it to Plaintiff for his use should he wish to amend the complaint.cc: Plaintiff, pro se, Defendants, General Counsel, Justice & Public Safety Cabinet, Office of Legal Counsel (KJA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
