Dozier v. Douglas Autotech Corporation
| Lamont Dozier |
| Douglas Autotech Corporation |
| 5:2019cv00082 |
| June 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Lanny King |
| Thomas B Russell |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER for proceedings held before Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell: Telephonic Scheduling Conference was held on 7/17/2019. Defendant Amended Pleadings due by 11/15/2019. Plaintiff Amended Pleadings due by 10/15/2019. Daubert Motion due by 5/22/2020. Discovery due by 3/13/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 5/22/2020. Expert Witness (Defendant) due by 3/9/2020. Expert Witness (Plaintiff) due by 2/7/2020. Telephonic Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/25/2020 at 10:30 AM before Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. Joinder of Parties due by 10/4/2019. Jury Trial set for 10/13/2020 at 09:00 AM in Paducah Courtroom before Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. Telephonic Status Conference set for 3/13/2020 at 01:00 PM before Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(l)(A), this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Lanny King for ruling on all discovery motions. cc: Counsel; CM-King (MNM)
|
| Filing 7 RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Douglas Autotech Corporation. (Jones, Brian) |
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 7/9/2019. IT IS ORDERED:1. Counsel who will represent the parties at trial and who have full authority to enter stipulations, to make admissions, and to bind the parties with respect to dates agreed upon or ordered shall be available for a TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ON JULY 17, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. CENTRAL TIME. The Court will place the call to counsel.2. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) Fed.R.Civ.P. counsel shall discuss and establish a discovery plan which shall be submitted to the Court at the scheduling conference either orally during the telephonic conference or in writing. Counsel are directed to make the mandatory disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(l) Fed.R.Civ.P. by said conference date.3. At the Rule 16 telephonic scheduling conference dates will be fixed for the following, as appropriate to the case: a) Joinder of additional parties and amendments to pleadings. b) Disclosure of deadlines for experts. c) Discovery scope, limits and completion. d) Filing of dispositive motions. e) Exchange of exhibits and final witness lists. f) Conferences before trial, including a final pretrial conference. g) Trial. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc:counsel (KPH)
|
| Filing 5 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Douglas Autotech Corporation. (Jones, Brian) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Douglas Autotech Corporation. (Jones, Brian) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Douglas Autotech Corporation. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (MNM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. (MNM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Douglas Autotech Corporation, filing fee $400, receipt number 0644-2881692, filed by Lamont Dozier. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Application for Employment, #2 Exhibit B - Offer of Employment, #3 Exhibit C - EEOC Complaint, #4 Exhibit D - Defendant's EEOC Position Statement, #5 Exhibit E - Notice of Right to Sue Letter, #6 Cover Sheet, #7 Summons Tendered) (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dozier v. Douglas Autotech Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lamont Dozier | |
| Represented By: | Mark N. Foster |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Douglas Autotech Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Brian Scott Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
