Patti's Holding Company, LLC et al v. Zurich American Insurance Company
| Patti's Holding Company, LLC, Patti's Enterprises, LLC, Michael Lee Grimes and William G. Tullar, Jr. |
| Zurich American Insurance Company |
| 5:2020cv00084 |
| May 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Lanny King |
| Thomas B Russell |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
NOTICE of service by Michael Lee Grimes, Patti's Enterprises, LLC, Patti's Holding Company, LLC, William G. Tullar, Jr (Straub, E.)
|
|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER for proceedings held before Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell: Telephonic Scheduling Conference was held on 6/22/2020. Amended Pleadings due by 7/31/2020. Daubert Motion due by 1/31/2021. Discovery due by 1/1/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 1/31/2021. Expert Witness (Defendant) due by 11/15/2020. Expert Witness (Plaintiff) due by 9/30/2020. Telephonic Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/7/2021 at 10:00 AM before Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. Jury Trial set for 5/17/2021 at 09:00 AM in Paducah Courtroom before Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. Telephonic Status Conference set for 1/5/2021 at 10:30 AM before Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(l)(A) this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Lanny King for ruling on all discovery motions. cc: Counsel, CM-King (MNM)
|
|
Filing 7
RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Michael Lee Grimes, Patti's Enterprises, LLC, Patti's Holding Company, LLC, William G. Tullar, Jr. (Straub, E.)
|
|
Filing 6
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Michael Lee Grimes, Patti's Enterprises, LLC, Patti's Holding Company, LLC, William G. Tullar, Jr. (Straub, E.)
|
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 6/11/2020. IT IS ORDERED:1. Counsel and plaintiff shall be available for a TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ON JUNE 22, 2020 at 11:00 AM CENTRAL TIME. The Court will place the call to counsel and to plaintiff.2. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) Fed.R.Civ.P. counsel and plaintiff shall discuss and establish a discovery plan which shall be submitted to the Court at the scheduling conference either orally during the telephonic conference or in writing. Counsel are directed to make the mandatory disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(l) Fed.R.Civ.P. by said conference date.3. At the Rule 16 telephonic scheduling conference dates will be fixed for the following, as appropriate to the case: a) Joinder of additional parties and amendments to pleadings. b) Disclosure of deadlines for experts. c) Discovery scope, limits and completion. d) Filing of dispositive motions. e) Exchange of exhibits and final witness lists. f) Conferences before trial, including a final pretrial conference. g) Trial. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. cc:counsel (KPH)
|
|
Filing 4
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Zurich American Insurance Company. (Walter, Richard)
|
|
Filing 3
CLERK'S NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal. cc: Counsel of Record, Livingston Circuit Court (MNM)
|
|
Filing 2
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. (MNM)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Zurich American Insurance Company from Livingston Circuit Court, case number 20-CI-00033 (filing fee $400, receipt number 0644-3109715). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint) (MNM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
