Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Jordan Alexander Lee |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 5:2021cv00159 |
| October 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Lanny King |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
SOCIAL SECURITY ORDER by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 12/15/2021; Social Security Submission due by 3/15/2022. (Attachments: #1 Fact and Law Summary Form) cc: Counsel (MNM)
|
|
Filing 9
CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Jordan Alexander Lee. (MNM)
|
|
Filing 8
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD received from Social Security by Commissioner of Social Security. (Lewis, Ameenah)
|
|
Filing 7
ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security. (Lewis, Ameenah)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice of Social Security Case Assignment re #1 Complaint. Social Security Notice due by 11/22/2021. (MNM)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF SERVICE pursuant to #General Order 2021-20: The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Kentucky having consented to electronic service of process of complaints seeking judicial review pursuant to 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), this notice shall constitute acceptance of service as outlined in Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1)(A) and (C). This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official Entry. No document is attached. (MNM)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 11/1/2021 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is ordered to file Plaintiff's Complaint. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), the Clerk of Court is appointed to effectuate service on the Commissioner of Social Security and the United States Attorney for the Western District of Kentucky electronically by following the process outlined in General Order No. 21-20. cc: Counsel(MNM)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jordan Alexander Lee. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (MNM)
|
|
Filing 2
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Lanny King. (MNM)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Jordan Alexander Lee. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Tendered) (MNM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jordan Alexander Lee | |
| Represented By: | Donna S. Thornton-Green |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Seth Schecter |
| Represented By: | Timothy D. Thompson |
| Represented By: | Ameenah Lewis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
