Crouse v. City of Murray, Kentucky et al
Timothy Christian Crouse |
City of Murray, Kentucky and County of Calloway, Kentucky |
5:2024cv00120 |
June 27, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Benjamin Beaton |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ORDER: For the reasons explained in the accompanying memorandum opinion, the Court dismisses this case under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The Court denies all pending motions as moot. cc: Plaintiff-pro se, Defendants (SMJ) |
Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION: For the reasons explained in the accompanying memorandum opinion, the Court dismisses this case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. cc: Plaintiff-pro se, Defendants (SMJ) |
Filing 21 ORDER: The Court denies the Plaintiff's application to proceed without prepayment of fees (DN #3 ). cc: Plaintiff-pro se (SMJ) |
Filing 20 MOTION for the Court to accept Exhibits R, S, and T by Plaintiff Timothy Christian Crouse. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit R, #2 Attachment 1, #3 Exhibit T) (JM) |
Filing 19 Letter from Plaintiff Timothy Christian Crouse. (JM) |
Filing 18 MOTION for the Court to accept Exhibit U by Plaintiff Timothy Christian Crouse. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit U) (JM) |
Filing 17 MOTION for the Court to Accept Exhibit P by Plaintiff Timothy Christian Crouse. (JM) |
Filing 16 MOTION for the Court to Accept Exhibit Q by Plaintiff Timothy Christian Crouse. (JM) |
Filing 15 MOTION for the Court to Accept Exhibits M, N and O by Plaintiff Timothy Christian Crouse. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit) (JM) |
Filing 14 Receipt of Non-Electronic Document re #12 MOTION for the Court to Accept Exhibit K. (MNM) |
Filing 13 Receipt of Non-Electronic Document re #11 MOTION to Enter Exhibit J- an SD Card. (MNM) |
Filing 12 MOTION for the Court to Accept Exhibit K by Plaintiff Timothy Christian Crouse. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (JM) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Enter Exhibit J- an SD Card by Plaintiff Timothy Christian Crouse (JM) |
Filing 10 Receipt of Non-Electronic Document re #9 . One (1) SD card. (MNM) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Court to Accept Exhibits F, G, and H by Plaintiff Timothy Christian Crouse. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (MNM) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Court to Accept Exhibit C by Plaintiff Timothy Christian Crouse. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit) (MNM) |
Filing 7 Receipt of Non-Electronic Document re #1 Complaint (MNM) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Court to Accept Exhibit D by Plaintiff Timothy Christian Crouse (in person at Paducah Office). (MNM) |
Filing 5 MOTION/Request to Accept Packet of Evidence as Exhibit 2-A, by Plaintiff Timothy Christian Crouse. (Attachments: #1 part 1, #2 part 2, #3 part 3, #4 part 4, #5 part 5, #6 part 6, #7 part 7, #8 part 8) (SMJ) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Add Exhibit by Plaintiff Timothy Christian Crouse. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Packet A) (MNM) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Timothy Christian Crouse (MNM) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Benjamin Beaton. (MNM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Murray, Kentucky, and County of Calloway, Kentucky, filed by Timothy Christian Crouse. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Tendered) (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.