Cain v. Desteny et al
| Cain |
| Comprehensive Correctional Care, Calloway County, West KY Correctional Care, Ofc Dillian Baynes, LT DJ, Ofc David Killop, Ofc Pisner, Lt Slade McCustion, Sgt Kelie Mathis, Ken Claud, 4 Rivers Mental Health, Sgt Lakin Dunkin, Ofc Xiavier Harris, Ofc Sgt Noah Page, Ofc Desteny, Lt Taylor Black, Major Thomas Marshall, Sgt Luke Jornsted, Ofc Zane Bartlett and Lt Adam Miller |
| 5:2024cv00140 |
| August 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Charles R Simpson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint,.Reason for Deficiency: No Filing Fee paid nor Motion to Appeal IFP filed, No Summons Tendered, and Complaint not on 1983 Form. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 9/23/2024. (DJT) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson III. (DJT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 4 Rivers Mental Health, Zane Bartlett, Dillian Baynes, Taylor Black, Calloway County, Ken Claud, Comprehensive Correctional Care, DJ, Desteny, Lakin Dunkin, Xiavier Harris, Luke Jornsted, David Killop, Thomas Marshall, Kelie Mathis, Slade McCustion, Adam Miller, Noah Page, Pisner, filed by Cain. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
