Baggs v. Terrell et al
Kurt Baggs |
Terry Terrell |
Attorney General State of Louisiana |
2:2009cv06808 |
October 14, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
St Tammany |
Mary Ann Vial Lemmon |
Karen Wells Roby |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 36 , 22 . Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon.(cbn) |
Filing 26 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 22 ; ORDER GRANTING 23 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Petition for Habeas Corpus. Matter referred to Magistrate Judge for a Report and Recommendation on the merits of pla's remaining claims. Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon on 9/20/12. (NEF: Mag. Roby)(cbn) |
Filing 19 ORDER AND REASONS granting 12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and that the amended petition SHALL be filedon or before 5/23/2012. FURTHER ORDERED that, on or before 6/25/2012, the respondent SHALL f ile a supplemental memorandum in opposition to Baggss amended petition. FURTHER ORDERED that, on or before 6/25/2012, Warden Terrells counsel SHALL present to the Pro Se Unit in the Clerk of Courts Office a supplemental volume(s) to the state court record, from the trail court, appellate court, and the Louisiana Supreme Court records.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 4/24/2012. (caa, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.