TFS Capital Solutions v. KO & Associates, LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Louisiana Eastern District TFS Capital Solutions v. KO & Associates, LLC

TFS Capital Solutions v. KO & Associates, LLC

Plaintiff:	TFS Capital Solutions
Defendant:	KO & Associates, LLC
Case Number:	2:2010cv01915
Filed:	July 7, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office:	New Orleans Office
County:	Out of State
Presiding Judge:	Karen Wells Roby
Presiding Judge:	Stanwood R. Duval
Nature of Suit:	Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 11, 2011	Filing 59 ORDER granting 58 Motion to Establish Amount of Attorney Fees, Costs and Expenses Due to TFS Capital Solutions. ORDERED that the Judgment of 7/8/2011 be amended, as stated in document. FURTHER ORDERED that TFS Capital Solutions, a division of Wel l Fargo Equipment Finance, Inc.'s, right to seek additional amounts to compensate it for attorney's fees, costs, and expenses incurred in defending any appeal lodged by KO & Associates and collecting the judgments obtained in this case is reserved. Signed by Judge Stanwood R. Duval, Jr on 8/11/2011. (blg)
December 13, 2010	Filing 38 ORDERED that KO & Associates, LLC and Khaled Kasem be held in contempt of this Court's 13 Order. FURTHER ORDERED that in order to cure this contempt that KO & Associates and Khaled Kasem appear before this Court on 1/12/2011 09:30 AM and provide the Court with the then current, precise location of the Equipment at issue. Signed by Judge Stanwood R. Duval, Jr. (CC:USM)(gec, )

Date Filed

Document Text

August 11, 2011

Filing 59 ORDER granting 58 Motion to Establish Amount of Attorney Fees, Costs and Expenses Due to TFS Capital Solutions. ORDERED that the Judgment of 7/8/2011 be amended, as stated in document. FURTHER ORDERED that TFS Capital Solutions, a division of Wel l Fargo Equipment Finance, Inc.'s, right to seek additional amounts to compensate it for attorney's fees, costs, and expenses incurred in defending any appeal lodged by KO & Associates and collecting the judgments obtained in this case is reserved. Signed by Judge Stanwood R. Duval, Jr on 8/11/2011. (blg)

December 13, 2010

Filing 38 ORDERED that KO & Associates, LLC and Khaled Kasem be held in contempt of this Court's 13 Order. FURTHER ORDERED that in order to cure this contempt that KO & Associates and Khaled Kasem appear before this Court on 1/12/2011 09:30 AM and provide the Court with the then current, precise location of the Equipment at issue. Signed by Judge Stanwood R. Duval, Jr. (CC:USM)(gec, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TFS Capital Solutions v. KO & Associates, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: TFS Capital Solutions
Represented By:	Richard A. Aguilar
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: KO & Associates, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?