Clark v PHI, Inc et al
| Ferris Clark, Sr. |
| PHI, Inc., Bell Helicopter Textron Inc., Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty AG and Energy XXI GOM, LLC |
| 2:2012cv00411 |
| February 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Orleans |
| Helen G. Berrigan |
| Alma L. Chasez |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
163
OPINION - ORDERED that plaintiff is entitled to recover $1,324,646.24 from PHI, Inc. and Allianz Global and Specialty AG as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Helen G. Berrigan on 7/16/2014.(kac)
|
|
Filing
136
ORDER AND REASONS ruling on objections to exhibits. Signed by Judge Helen G. Berrigan on 10/25/2013.(kac, )
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER AND REASONS denying 79 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Helen G. Berrigan on 10/17/2013. (kac, )
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER AND REASONS denying 81 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Helen G. Berrigan on 10/2/2013. (kac, )
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER granting 52 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Helen G. Berrigan on 12/21/2012. (lag, )
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER & REASONS dismissing with prejudice 30 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 34 Motion to Continue Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Helen G. Berrigan on 07/27/2012. (kac, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
