Arch Specialty Insurance Company v. C&G Construction of Louisiana, Inc.
| Arch Specialty Insurance Company |
| C&G Construction of Louisiana, Inc. |
| 2:2012cv02047 |
| August 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Out of State |
| Stanwood R. Duval |
| Daniel E. Knowles |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
234
ORDER & REASONS that American Automobile Insurance Company's Renewed 188 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and judgment shall be entered in favor of American Automobile Insurance Company and against William Sacks and Houston Specialty Insurance Company, dismissing their claims with prejudice with each party to bear its/his own costs.Signed by Judge Stanwood R. Duval, Jr on 9/14/15.(Reference: 12-2047 and 13-6117) (dno)
|
|
Filing
218
ORDER AND REASONS denying 187 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Stanwood R. Duval, Jr on 8/18/2015. (Reference: 12-2047)(blg)
|
|
Filing
163
ORDER AND REASONS denying 132 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by American Automobile Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Stanwood R. Duval, Jr on 1/28/2015.(Reference: 13-6117)(blg)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER AND REASONS denying 103 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Stanwood R. Duval, Jr on 7/23/2014. (Reference: 13-5336)(my)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
