Briggs et al v. Phebus et al
Plaintiff: Willene Briggs and Kim Brumfield
Defendant: Daniel Edwards and William Phebus
Case Number: 2:2012cv02145
Filed: August 21, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: New Orleans Office
County: Tangipahoa
Presiding Judge: Carl Barbier
Presiding Judge: Karen Wells Roby
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 229 ORDERED that 191 Motion to Take Additional Deposition is DENIED AS MOOT IN PART and DENIED IN PART. FURTHER ORDERED that 199 Motion to Quash, Motion for Protective Order and 224 Supplemental & Amended Motion to Quash, Motion for Protective Order are DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby.(cml)
March 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 227 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 160 Daniel Edwards, William Phebus, and Steven Redmond's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Galmon's 42 U.S.C. 1983 claims against Lieutenant Steven Redmond are DISM ISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED that, inasmuch as Mr. Galmon's 42 U.S.C. 1983 claims are based on: (1) a denial of medical care in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, or (2) deliberate indifference in hiring, Mr. Galmon's claims a re DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff will be allowed to proceed on: (1) 42 U.S.C. 1983 claims based on excessive force against Deputy Phebus in his individual capacity; (2) 42 U.S.C. 1983 claims against Sheriff Edwards in his official capacity based on excessive force and failure to supervise/train; and (3) all state law claims. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 3/17/14. (Reference: 13-5342)(sek)
December 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 152 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 135 plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration as set forth in document; FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff has twenty-one (21) days to amend his complaint as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 12/23/13. (Reference: 13-5342)(sek, )
November 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 134 ORDER & REASONS: granting in part and denying in part 122 , 124 Motions to Dismiss; ORDERED that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED with respect to: (1) all Section 1983 claims against Sheriff Edwards based on his actions or inactions with respect to Lt. Redmond; (2) all Section 1983 claims against Lt. Redmond in his official capacity, (3) all Section 1983 claims against Lt. Redmond in his supervisory capacity; and (4) all Section 1983 claims against Lt. Redmond in his individual capacity inasmuch as the claim relies on a theory of excessive force. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motions are DENIED in all other respects. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 11/6/13. (Reference: 13-5335, 13-5342)(sek, )
August 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER & REASONS: denying 76 Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 8/29/13. (Reference: all cases)(sek, )
August 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER & REASONS: granting in part and denying in part 56 Motion in Limine; ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine (Rec. Doc. 56 ) is GRANTED only to the extent it seeks to exclude evidence arising from the grand jury proceedings of Deputy Phebus. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine is DENIED AS PREMATURE in all other respects. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 8/7/13. (sek, )
November 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 5 Motion to Dismiss; FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. However, because it appears that the defects in Plaintiffs' pleading can be cured by amendment, Pla intiffs are GRANTED leave to amend their pleadings to make a proper showing of capacity under Louisiana Civil Code Articles 2315.1 and 2315.2. Plaintiffs must submit an amended complaint to this Court within twenty-one (21) days of entry of this Order. Failure to amend Plaintiffs' complaint within the required period will result in complete dismissal of Plaintiffs' causes of action for survival and wrongful death. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 11/26/12. (sek, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Briggs et al v. Phebus et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Phebus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willene Briggs
Represented By: Blake S. Leger
Represented By: Donna Unkel Grodner
Represented By: Marcus Joseph Plaisance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kim Brumfield
Represented By: Donna Unkel Grodner
Represented By: Blake S. Leger
Represented By: Marcus Joseph Plaisance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?