Crutchfield et al v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans et al
Ronda Crutchfield, Wade Crutchfield, Audrey Haines, Joseph A. Haines, Matella Mosby, Velma B. Renard, Katie Anthony and Ricky Anthony, Sr |
Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans and Unidentified Parties |
Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans |
Hill Brothers Construction Company, Inc |
2:2013cv04801 |
June 14, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Orleans |
Helen G. Berrigan |
Alma L. Chasez |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 363 ORDER & REASONS denying 333 Motion to Certify Class; 350 Motion to Strike; & 351 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Martin L.C. Feldman on 6/25/2015. (caa) |
Filing 327 ORDER & REASONS denying 319 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge Martin L.C. Feldman on 4/20/2015. (caa) |
Filing 307 ORDER AND REASONS denying without prejudice 235 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Helen G. Berrigan on 03/04/2015. (kac) |
Filing 218 ORDER AND REASONS granting 189 Motion for Leave to File second supplemental and amended class action complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North. (lag) |
Filing 198 ORDER AND REASONS re 170 MOTION to Compel Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Deposition of Hill Brothers Construction Company filed by Velma B. Renard, Matella Mosby, Joseph A. Haines, Audrey Haines, Ronda Crutchfield, Katie Anthony, Wade Crutchfield, Ricky Anthony, Sr. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North.(lag) |
Filing 117 ORDER AND REASONS denying 97 Motion to Compel Subpoena Responses FromLeonard C. Quick & Associates and for Contempt and Sanctions; granting 101 Motion to Compel Rule 34 Inspection as set forth in document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North. (lag) |
Filing 66 ORDER AND REASONS Establishing Precertification Discovery Plan. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North.(lag) |
Filing 57 ORDER AND REASONS denying 55 MOTION for APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court re the Sewerage and Water Boards motion to quash the plaintiffs subpoena duces tecum to Leonard C. Quick & Associates and FFEB JV, LLC. Signed by Judge Helen G. Berrigan on 02/03/2014. |
Filing 56 ORDER AND REASONS granting 28 Motion to Continue Submission Date for plaintiffs' Motion to Certify Class. FURTHER ORDERED that the parties contact Magistrate Judge Chasez by 02/14/2014 to set a scheduling conference for pre-certification discovery. Signed by Judge Helen G. Berrigan on 01/30/2014. (kac, ) |
Filing 54 Minute Order. Proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Alma L. Chasez: Motion Hearing held on 1/8/2014 re 40 MOTION to Quash Plaintiffs' Subpoenas Duces Tecum to Leonard C. Quick & Associates, Inc. and FFEB JV, LLC filed by Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans. (lag, ) |
Filing 24 ORDER and REASON re: 7 Motion to Supplement the Federal Court Record with State Court Written Judgments and Hearing Transcript. ORDERED that plaintiffs' Motion to Supplement the Federal Court Record with State Court Written Judgments and He aring Transcript is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as set forth in document. FURTHER ORDERED that the transcript of the May 16, 2013 motions hearing is hereby ADMITTED as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Helen G. Berrigan on 11/25/13. (plh, ) Modified doc type on 11/26/2013 (plh, ). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.