Shale Consultants LLC v. Wilson, III et al
| Shale Consultants LLC |
| FRAC Consulting L L C and George Wilson, III |
| 2:2013cv05728 |
| September 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Ouachita |
| Kurt D. Engelhardt |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER and REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion (Rec. Doc. 46) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss with prejudice (Rec. Doc. 43) is GRANTED, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 11/6/2014. (cbs)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER and REASONS granting 35 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 9/17/2014. (cbs)
|
|
Filing
32
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 27 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that the 7 motion to dismiss for improper venue, and in the alternative to transfer is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. To the extent that Defendants move for transfer, the motion is GRANTED. This matter is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. The motion is otherwise DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 9/3/13. (crt,DickersonSld, D)[Transferred from lawd on 9/4/2013.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
