Chauvin v. National Gypsum Service Company et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 21, 2014
ORDER and REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (Rec. Doc. 32) is GRANTED, and the Court's Order and Reasons of June 13, 2014 (Rec. Doc. 29) is hereby VACATED; Defendant's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion t o Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. 27) is hereby GRANTED IN PART, and DENIED IN PART. The plaintiff's claims under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. 1140, under the Louisiana Whistleblower Protection Statute, La. Rev. Stat. 23:967(A), and for intentional infliction of emotional distress are hereby DISMISSED; and (4) The defendant's Motion to Assess Defense Costs and Attorney Fees (Rec. Doc. 38) is hereby DENIED, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 7/21/2014.(cbs)
|June 13, 2014
ORDER and REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. 27) is hereby GRANTED, and the plaintiff's claims are hereby DISMISSED. A motion for reconsideration of this Order, if any, must be filed within ten (10) days of the date this Order is entered by the Clerk of Court, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 6/13/2014. (cbs)
|March 13, 2014
ORDER & REASONS granting 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Party New NGC, Inc dismissed. FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall have twenty (20) days in which to file an amended complaint. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 3/13/2014. (mmm)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?