Peaker Energy Group, LLC et al v. Cargill, Incorporated et al
| Peaker Energy Group, LLC and Energy Coast Logistics Terminal, LLC |
| Cargill, Incorporated and Louisiana Sugar Refining, LLC |
| 2:2014cv02106 |
| September 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Out of State |
| Kurt D. Engelhardt |
| Daniel E. Knowles |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
414
ORDER and REASONS denying as moot the 375 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery To Permit the Depositions of Two Out-of-State Witnesses, as stated within document. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 1/4/2017. (cc: MAG-3) (cbs) .
|
|
Filing
410
ORDER and REASONS granting in part and denying in part 270 Motion for Summary Judgment on Peaker Energy Group, LLC's Claims, as stated within document. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 1/3/2017. (NEF: MAG-3) (cbs)
|
|
Filing
405
ORDER AND REASONS: ORDERED that the 265 Motion for Summary Judgment on Lost-Profits Damages is GRANTED to the extent stated herein relative to any damages award for "lost profits" or "lost business value" sought by Plaintiffs Peaker Energy Group., LLC and Energy Coast Logistics Terminal,LLC in this matter. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt. (cml) (NEF:MAG KNOWLES)
|
|
Filing
382
ORDER AND REASONS: ORDERED that 155 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt. (NEF: MAG.KNOWLES) (cml)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER and REASONS granting in part and denying in part 40 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Louisiana Sugar Refining, LLC and 41 Motion to Dismiss by Cargill, Incorporated, as stated within document. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 6/27/2016. (cbs)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER and REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' motions (Rec. Docs. 6 and 8) are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that these rulings are without prejudice to Plaintiffs' right to attempt to cure the identified de ficiencies by amendment filed no later twenty (20) days from the entry of this Order and Reasons. Any such amendment is to be set forth in a second amended and superseding complaint, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 8/14/2015. (cbs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
