Blaze Chaus, LLC v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Blaze Chaus, LLC |
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company |
2:2015cv00552 |
February 19, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
St Tammany |
Lance M Africk |
Karen Wells Roby |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 122 ORDER & REASONS: ORDERED that 65 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED with respect to (1) claims by any entity for Equipment Breakdown coverage or Spoilage coverage, and (2) claims by any entity other than Blaze or Kelly G. Burkenstock, M.D., APMC, for computer equipment, valuable papers and records. FURTHER ORDERED that the motion is DENIED with respect to claims by Blaze or Kelly G. Burkenstock, M.D., APMC for computer equipment or valuable papers and records coverage. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk. (cml) |
Filing 118 ORDER AND REASONS granting in part, denying in part 66 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's Claim for Mold and State Farm's Mold Exclusion. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 10/6/2015.(blg) |
Filing 115 ORDER AND REASONS re 52 MOTION to strike or limit the testimony of A. Philip Moss, Jr., CPA; ORDERED that State Farm's 52 motion is GRANTED IN PART with respect to testimony by Moss as to business losses incurred by Azure Spa, Inc., and DEFERRED UNTIL TRIAL in all other respects. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 10/5/2015.(blg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.