Tractor and Equipment Co. v. Dual Trucking and Transport, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Tractor and Equipment Co.
Defendant: Dual Trucking and Transport, LLC and Anthony Alford
Case Number: 2:2015cv05413
Filed: October 23, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: New Orleans Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: Michael North
Presiding Judge: Sarah S. Vance
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER AND REASONS granting in part and denying in part 68 Motion to Stay of Proceedings and approval of a supersedeas bond. IT IS ORDERED that defendants' motion to approve a supersedeas bond in the amount of $448,801.74 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all proceedings to execute the Court's August 22, 2017 judgment are to be stayed upon Anthony Alford's posting with this Court a supersedeas bond in the amount of $695,928.72. Execution of the judgment is hereby STAYED for a period of fifteen days to allow the defendant sufficient time to post a bond in that amount.. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 10/4/2017. (jjs)
August 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER granting 48 Motion to Reopen Case; granting Motion to Enforce Judgment; granting Motion for Attorney Fees. IT IS ORDERED that there be a judgment in favor of plaintiff against Defendant Anthony Alford in the amount of $292,846.30 in pri ncipal, plus interest at the rate of 18 percent per annum from October 31, 2013, attorneys' fees in the amount of $30,508.50 and costs in the amount of $1,111.55. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that there be a judgment in favor of plaintiff against Alford in the additional amount of $49,535.10 for attorneys' fees incurred by plaintiff in enforcing Alford's guarantee and the Montana judgment in Louisiana. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 8/22/2017. (cg)
April 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER AND REASONS granting 16 Tractor & Equipment's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 17 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Tractor and Equipment's motion in limine to exclude parol evidence is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 4/3/2017. (cg)
June 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER AND REASONS denying 4 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 6/7/16. (jjs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tractor and Equipment Co. v. Dual Trucking and Transport, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dual Trucking and Transport, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthony Alford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tractor and Equipment Co.
Represented By: William Nicholas Abel
Represented By: Todd M. Magee
Represented By: Christopher H. Riviere
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?