Ponds et al v. Force Corporation
| Reginald A Ponds and Maryl K Wright |
| Force Corporation |
| 2:2016cv01935 |
| March 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Jefferson |
| Michael North |
| Jay C. Zainey |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER AND REASONS: ORDERED that defendant's 56 motion in limine to exclude evidence of the track repairs performed by defendant after the accident is DEFERRED UNTIL TRIAL. No party shall mention the track repairs at trial without first obtain ing the Court's permission at a bench conference. FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's 57 motion in limine to exclude all evidence and testimony related to plaintiff's claim for loss of future earning capacity is DENIED. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 1/10/2017.(blg)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER AND REASONS re 43 Objections filed by Maryl K Wright, Reginald A Ponds - IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's objection regarding the accident re-enactment video is DISMISSED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's objection regarding the Root Cause Investigation Report is GRANTED as set forth herein. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk.(bwn)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER AND REASONS granting in part, denying in part 21 MOTION in Limine to Limit Expert Report and Testimony of Alan J. Blackwell. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 12/8/2016.(blg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
