DeCossas et al v. St. Tammany Parish School Board et al
| Elizabeth Z. DeCossas and Ronald DeCossas |
| St. Tammany Parish School Board, Bryon Gerchow, Kevin R. Darouse, W.L. Trey Folse, III, Leonard Tridico, Neal M Hennegan, Peter J. Jabbia and Michael Astague |
| 2:2016cv03786 |
| April 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| St Tammany |
| Nannette Jolivette Brown |
| Michael North |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 62 Motion for Summary Judgment. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs are granted leave to amend their complaintwithin 14 days to provide a more definite statement as to any alleged state law claims. Signed by Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown. (jrc)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Deputy Gerchow's 61 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED to the extent that it requests summary judgment on Plaintiffs claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Deputy Gerchow in his official and individual capacities, and the Court in its discretion declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any remaining state law claims against Deputy Gerchow. Signed by Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 8/10/2017. (mmv)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Movants' 4 Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to FRCP Rule 12(e) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED IN PART to the ex tent that Plaintiffs' request for punitive damages for its claims against the School Board under 42 U.S.C. 1983 is dismissed. The motion is also GRANTED IN PART to the extent that Movants request a more definite statement pursuant to Rule 12(e) as to the federal and state law claims against Movants. The motion is DENIED IN PART to the extent it requests dismissal of Plaintiffs' federal and state law claims against Movants. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs are granted leave to amen d their Complaint within 21 days of this Order. Plaintiffs are to amend their Complaint to provide a more definite statement of: (1) their federal and state law claims against the School Board; (2) their claims against the individual Movants for reli ef under Section 1983, including a non-conclusory statement of the specific conduct in which individual Movants engaged to violate their rights and whether they are suing the individual Movants in their personal or official capacities; and (3) their claims for relief against the individual Movants under state law. If Plaintiffs fail to amend their Complaint within 21 days, upon a motion by Defendants, their claims against Movants will be dismissed. Signed by Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 3/27/2017. (mmv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
