Shell Offshore Inc. v. Eni Petroleum US LLC et al
Shell Offshore Inc. |
Eni Petroleum US LLC and Eni Petroleum Co. Inc. |
2:2016cv15537 |
October 14, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Out of State |
Susie Morgan |
Joseph C. Wilkinson |
Other Contract |
43 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 345 ORDER AND REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Shell Offshore, Inc.'s 191 motion in limine to exclude the testimony of Jim Bryan at trial is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Shell Offshore, Inc.' s 196 motion in limine to exclude the testimony of Tom Lee at trial is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Shell Offshore, Inc.'s 187 motion in limine to exclude the testimony of Geoffery Kimbrough at trial is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant ENI Petroleum US LLC's 188 motion in limine to exclude the testimony of Lance Labiche at trial is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan. (bwn) |
Filing 337 ORDER AND REASONS granting 189 Motion in Limine to limit the testimony of Dr. Robert Maness. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 3/28/2018. (clc) |
Filing 287 ORDER AND REASONS re 268 MOTION to Seal Document Impeachment Exhibits filed by ENI Petroleum U.S., L.L.C. - The Court HEREBY DENIES Defendant Eni Petroleum US LLC's motion to file impeachment exhibits under seal. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Eni's motion, with attachments, be unsealed and filed on the record. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 2/12/2018.(bwn) |
Filing 281 ORDER denying 198 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 2/12/2018. (bwn) |
Filing 165 ORDER AND REASONS granting in part and denying in part 131 Motion to Dismiss Certain Claims. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan. (bwn) |
Filing 147 ORDER AND REASONS: This is a contract dispute concerning offshore rig operations and the governmentally mandated abandonment of four oil field wells located on the Outer Continental Shelf. The disputed motion of defendant Eni Petroleum US LLC (" Eni") to file summary judgment response, material facts, and exhibits under seal, Record Doc. No. 124 , is pending before me. I deferred the motion and temporarily placed the exhibits under seal pending furthercourt order. Record Doc. Nos. [126 ]. Having considered all of these factors, I find that Shell has not carried its evidentiary burden to show that good cause exists to protect the subject materials from disclosure by sealing them in this court's presumptively public record. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Eni's 124 motion to seal is DENIED as set forth in document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson, Jr on 9/22/2017. (mmv) |
Filing 146 ORDER AND REASONS denying 38 Partial Motion to Dismiss claims asserted in Defendant's counterclaim. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 9/20/2017. (clc) |
Filing 117 ORDER AND REASONS re 14] Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, 76 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. ORDERED that Eni-Inc.'s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b) (2) is GRANTED. The claims against Eni-Inc. are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED that Eni-LLC's and Eni-Operating's motions to dismiss are hereby GRANTED IN PART, DEFERRED IN PART, and DISMISSED AS MOOT IN PART, as further explained herein. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 8/17/2017. (clc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.