Williams v. Department of Children and Family Services State of Louisiana et al
| Garland E. Williams |
| Department of Children and Family Services State of Louisiana and Mandy Pierre |
| 2:2016cv15866 |
| October 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| St Tammany |
| Ivan L.R. Lemelle |
| Joseph C. Wilkinson |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS ORDERED that the 34 , 35 motions are GRANTED. All of Plaintiff's claims against the State of Louisiana, through the Department of Children and Family Services, and Mandy Pierre are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to the State's sovereign immunity and for failure to state a claim as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 5/8/2017. (mmv)
|
|
Filing
27
OPINION: IT IS ORDERED that the 16 , 22 motions requesting leave to submit evidence into the record are DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the 17 motion apparently requesting oral argument is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff' s apparent 19 motion for summary judgment is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS PREMATURE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the 25 motions for default judgment and 26 for final judgment are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 3/9/2017. (mmv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
