Wiltz v. M-I LLC et al
| Gerald Wiltz |
| M-I LLC, Rowan Companies, Inc., Cobalt International Energy, LP and Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. |
| 2:2017cv04943 |
| May 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Ascension |
| Kurt D. Engelhardt |
| Michael North |
| Marine |
| 46 U.S.C. ยง 30104 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Rowan Companies, Inc.'s 60 Rule 12 Motion to Dismiss Any and All Punitive Damages Claims is GRANTED and any request for punitive damages against Rowan Companies, Inc. is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 12/3/2018. (mmv)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER and REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.'s Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Punitive Damages Claim 14 and Defendant Cobalt International Energy, L.P.'s Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Punitive Damages Claim 18 are GRANTED, and Wiltz's claims against Halliburton and Cobalt for punitive damages are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, as stated within document. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 1/29/2018. (cbs)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER AND REASONS granting 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Party M-I LLC dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 12/27/2017. (sa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
