Sream, Inc. v. Smoke N' Style
Plaintiff: Sream, Inc.
Defendant: Smoke N' Style
Case Number: 2:2017cv08184
Filed: August 24, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: New Orleans Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: Karen Wells Roby
Presiding Judge: Sarah S. Vance
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER AND REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss Sream's claims under 15 U.S.C. § 1114 filed by Defendants Superior Discount, Guide-One National Insurance Company, and India Imports LLC in case no. 17-8177; Defendant Joseph Tru ong, Inc. in case no. 17-8179; Defendants MKM Group, LLC and India Imports, LLC in case no. 17-8184; Defendant Dock Quick Stop, LLC in case no. 17-8191; Defendants M&S Fuel, LLC and India Imports, LLC in case no. 17-8205; Defendant E-Z Pick, Inc. in case no. 17-8216; Defendants Discount-N-Out, LLC and India Imports, LLC in case No. 17-8238; and Defendant Quickys Discount in case no. 17-8243 are GRANTED and Sream's claims under 15 U.S.C. § 1114 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in those acti ons. Pursuant to the Court's sua sponte determination of its subject matter jurisdiction, Sream's claims under 15 U.S.C. § 1114 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE against all Defendants in the following captioned cases: 17-8177; 17-8179; 17 -8180; 17-8184; 17-8186; 17-8191; 17-8193; 17-8205; 17-8216; 17-8218; 17-8238; 17-8242; 17-8243; 17-8244; 17-8246; and 17-8252. The Motions to Dismiss Sream's claims under 15 U.S.C. § 1125 are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the reques ts for Rule 11 sanctions made by Defendant Joseph Truong, Inc. in case no. 17-8179; Defendant E-Z Pick, Inc. in case no. 17-8216; and Defendant Quickys Discount in case no. 17-8234 are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motions for Leave to Amen d Complaint to Add Additional Party Plaintiff filed by Sream are GRANTED. Sream is given leave to file an amended complaint in the following captioned cases by no later than Monday, March 11, 2019: 17-8177; 17-8179; 17-8180; 17-8184; 17-8186; 17-819 1; 17-8193; 17-8205; 17-8216; 17-8218; 17-8238; 17-8242; 17-8243; 17-8244; 17-8246; and 17-8252. The amended complaint shall be signed by counsel for both Sream, Inc. and Roor International BV, shall have all referenced exhibits attached, and shall properly name each Defendant. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motions to Stay filed by Defendant Superior Discount, LLC in case no. 17-8177; Defendant MKM Group, LLC in case no. 17-8184; Defendant Discount-N-Out, LLC in case no. 17-8238; and Defendant Quickys Discount in case no. 17-8243 are DENIED. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 3/1/19.(sbs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sream, Inc. v. Smoke N' Style
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smoke N' Style
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sream, Inc.
Represented By: Jacques F. Bezou, Jr.
Represented By: Erica A. Hyla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?