Sanchez v. Social Security Administration
| Brittany Sanchez |
| Social Security Administration |
| 2:2018cv07367 |
| August 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Orleans |
| Ivan LR Lemelle |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 (3) Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration. (mp) |
Filing 5
ORDER: ORDERED that the #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on September 12, 2018. (Attachments: #1 Pauper Letter) (mp)
|
| Filing 4 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #2 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. **1) Filing attorney selected incorrect event. Correct event is Motion for Leave to PROCEED in forma pauperis. Clerk took corrective action by changing the event. **2) Filing attorney should have selected 'Yes' at the question 'Is this an Exparte/Consent Motion Y/N?'. Exparte/Consent motions are not set for submission. Clerk has removed submission date. **3) Filing attorney should have changed 'N' to 'Y' at the question 'Is this motion to be decided by the Magistrate Judge Y/N?'. This motion will be decided by the Magistrate Judge. Clerk took corrective action. **4) Filing attorney did not include a properly formatted proposed order. Proposed Order subsequently provided to Clerk and has now been attached to the motion. *Please note that for all future filings, each document should have a complete caption that lists the names of the parties and also the case number, section and division that has been assigned to that case. ** (jls) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (ess) |
| Filing 2 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brittany Sanchez. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby.(Attachments: #1 Exhibit Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, #2 Proposed Order)(Terrebonne, Perry) (Attachment 2 replaced on 8/7/2018) (jls). Modified event/text/replaced order/removed submission date/added referral on 8/7/2018 (jls). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration (In Forma Pauperis status requested) filed by Brittany Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)Attorney Perry Walker Terrebonne added to party Brittany Sanchez(pty:pla).(Terrebonne, Perry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sanchez v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brittany Sanchez | |
| Represented By: | Perry Walker Terrebonne |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
