Dantzler v Louisiana Secretary of State, et al
Oscar Dantzler |
Registrar of Voters Office, Unidentified Parties, Willie Johnson, Louisiana Secretary of State, R Kyle Ardoin, Tangipahoa Parish Clerk of Court and Gary T Stanga |
2:2018cv11022 |
November 15, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Barry W Ashe |
Karen Wells Roby |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to R Kyle Ardoin, Willie Johnson, Louisiana Secretary of State, Registrar of Voters Office, Gary T Stanga, Tangipahoa Parish Clerk of Court. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Mailed to ProSe Plaintiff) (mm) |
Filing 3 ORDER AND REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that Dantzler's Motion to Stay (Rec. Doc. #2 ) is DENIED, as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 11/19/2018. (sa) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Oscar Dantzler. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(mm) |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus against Oscar Dantzler, R Kyle Ardoin, Willie Johnson, Louisiana Secretary of State, Registrar of Voters Office, Gary T Stanga, Tangipahoa Parish Clerk of Court, Unidentified Parties (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Oscar Dantzler. (Attachments: #1 Verification, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(mm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.