Barker v. Vannoy et al
Plaintiff: Samuel Barker
Defendant: Darrell Vannoy
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Case Number: 2:2018cv11696
Filed: November 28, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Dana Douglas
Referring Judge: Daniel E Knowles
2 Judge: Susie Morgan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 16, 2019 Filing 10 Response by Samuel Barker to #8 Order. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(sbs)
January 16, 2019 Filing 9 Request by Samuel Barker for Clarification on Filing Status. (sbs)
January 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER that petitioner complete and return the attached standard form on or before 2/8/2019. If petitioner fails to comply with this Order, the undersigned will issue a report recommending that this matter be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas on 1/10/2019. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(caa) Modified on 1/15/2019 (caa).
January 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas on 1/10/2019. (caa)
January 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Knowles, III no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown.(ADI)
January 7, 2019 Filing 5 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Samuel Barker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(sbs)
January 7, 2019 Filing 4 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Samuel Barker. Motion(s) referred to Dana Douglas. (sbs) Modified text on 1/8/2019 (sbs).
December 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER that petitioner either pay the required filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis on or before 1/18/2019. If petitioner fails to comply with this Order, this civil action may be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Knowles, III on 12/28/2018.(caa)
November 28, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254). Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 12/19/2018. (sbs)
November 28, 2018 Filing 1 **DEFICIENT** PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Samuel Barker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(sbs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barker v. Vannoy et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darrell Vannoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samuel Barker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?