Vindel v. MG Group, LLC et al
Miguel Vindel |
Dominic Godbold, Aaron Middleburg and MG Group, LLC |
2:2019cv11476 |
July 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Ivan LR Lemelle |
Karen Wells Roby |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants shall file responsive pleadings no later than 8/22/2019. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 8/2/2019. (jls) |
Filing 4 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, by Dominic Godbold, MG Group, LLC, Aaron Middleburg. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Hal D. Ungar added to party Dominic Godbold(pty:dft), Attorney Hal D. Ungar added to party MG Group, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Hal D. Ungar added to party Aaron Middleburg(pty:dft).(Ungar, Hal) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Dominic Godbold, MG Group, LLC, Aaron Middleburg. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(pp) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (ess) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7737737) filed by Miguel Vindel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)Attorney Jonathan Mille Kirkland added to party Miguel Vindel(pty:pla).(Kirkland, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.