Terrick v. Vannoy et al
| Bobby Carl Terrick |
| Darryl Vannoy |
| Attorney General State of Louisiana |
| 2:2019cv11515 |
| July 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Ivan LR Lemelle |
| Michael North |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 USCA Case Number 19-30652 appealed to USCA, Fifth Circuit re #4 ORDER transferring petition to U.S. Court of Appeals. (jls) |
Filing 4
ORDER transferring petition to U.S. Court of Appeals - 5th Circuit to determine if petitioner is allowed to file successive habeas petition in this court. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 8/13/2019.(jls)
|
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) (Filing fee paid) filed by Bobby Carl Terrick. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(jls) |
| Filing fee paid from Bobby Carl Terrick re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) (Filing fee $ 5) (jls) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254). Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 7/29/2019. (am) |
| Filing 1 **DEFICIENT**PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Bobby Carl Terrick. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(am) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
