Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. Pete Vicari General Contractor, LLC et al
Employers Mutual Casualty Company |
Peter G Vicari, Barbara T Vicari, Pete Vicari General Contractor, LLC, Peter Vicari and Barbara Vicari |
2:2019cv12652 |
September 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Dana Douglas |
Eldon E Fallon |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; waiver sent to Peter Vicari on 9/17/2019, answer due 11/18/2019. (D'Arcy, Adrian) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; waiver sent to Barbara Vicari on 9/17/2019, answer due 11/18/2019. (D'Arcy, Adrian) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; waiver sent to Pete Vicari General Contractor, LLC on 9/17/2019, answer due 11/18/2019. (D'Arcy, Adrian) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Eldon E. Fallon and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (aj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pete Vicari General Contractor, LLC, Barbara T Vicari, Peter G Vicari (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7859209) filed by Employers Mutual Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Adrian A. D'Arcy added to party Employers Mutual Casualty Company(pty:pla).(D'Arcy, Adrian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.