National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, et al v Tracer Construction, LLC
International-Matex Tank Terminals LLC and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. |
Tracer Construction, LLC and Tyco Thermal Controls |
Tracer Construction Company |
2:2020cv02056 |
July 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Michael North |
Sarah S Vance |
Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; waiver sent to Tracer Construction, LLC on 8/20/2020, answer due 10/19/2020. (Sevin, Kelley) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Tracer Construction, LLC. (mm) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Sarah S. Vance and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (cc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tracer Construction, LLC (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAEDC-8409844) filed by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, International-Matex Tank Terminals LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) Attorney Elton Ford Duncan, III added to party International-Matex Tank Terminals LLC(pty:pla), Attorney Elton Ford Duncan, III added to party National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA(pty:pla).(Duncan, Elton) Modified text on 7/21/2020 (mm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.