Evans vs. Sanofi US Services Inc., et al
| Cheryl Evans |
| Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. f/k/a Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories Ltd., Actavis LLC f/k/a Actavis Inc., Hospira, Inc., Pfizer Inc, Sanofi US Services Inc. F/K/A Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sun Pharma Global FZE, McKesson Corporation d/b/a McKesson Packaging, Sandoz, Inc., Hospira Worldwide, LLC f/k/a Hospira Worldwide, Inc., Accord Healthcare, Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc., Actavis LLC, Hospira Worldwide, LLC, Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc., McKesson Corporation doing business as McKesson Packaging, Actavis Inc. and Hospira Worldwide, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv00059 |
| January 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Jane Triche Milazzo |
| Michael North |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(ss) |
| Filing 8 Summons Submitted for Issuance (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Gonzalez, Magdalena) |
| Filing 7 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #6 Summons Submitted for Issuance. **Filing attorney submitted summons containing incorrect Case Caption. The Caption in the summons must match the Caption of the case. Clerk unable to issue incorrect summons. (ss) |
| Filing 6 Summons Submitted for Issuance (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Gonzalez, Magdalena) |
Filing 5
PRETRIAL ORDERS. Signed by Judge Jane Triche Milazzo.(am)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Accord Healthcare, Inc., Actavis LLC, Hospira Worldwide, LLC, McKesson Corporation, Pfizer Inc, Sandoz, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(ss) |
| Filing 3 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Complaint. **Filing attorney did not properly format the pdf of Summons requested. The pdf should not have the green header nor the 3 red buttons at the bottom. When using a FORM, fill in the applicable fields then click the red PRINT button at the bottom to print the document to pdf format. Clerk took corrective action. Also, regarding Rec. Docs 8 and 9 filing attorney incorrectly listed multiple defendants on one Summons. Summons form should only be addressed to one named defendant (per form). Clerk is unable to issue incorrectly formatted summons. Attorney must refile in the member case a properly completed summons for each named defendant in which he seeks service.** (ss) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jane Triche Milazzo and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (aj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against all Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-8681429) filed by Cheryl Evans. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Accord Healthcare Summons (Evans), #3 Actavis LLC Summons, #4 Hospira Summons, #5 McKesson Corporation Summons, #6 Pfizer Summons, (7) Sandoz Summons, #8 Sanofi Summons, #9 Sun Pharma Global Summons)Attorney Sung Cheol Sam Park added to party Cheryl Evans (pty:), (Park, Sung Cheol Sam) Modified text on 1/13/2021 (ss). (Attachment 2 replaced on 1/13/2021) (ss). (Attachment 3 replaced on 1/13/2021) (ss). (Attachment 4 replaced on 1/13/2021) (ss). (Attachment 5 replaced on 1/13/2021) (ss). (Attachment 6 replaced on 1/13/2021) (ss). (Attachment 7 replaced on 1/13/2021) (ss). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
