Cox v. Louisiana State et al
Albert Cox |
Darrell Vannoy, Louisiana State and N. Burl Cain |
Attorney General State of Louisiana |
2:2021cv00375 |
February 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Nannette Jolivette Brown |
Karen Wells Roby |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: that, on or before 4/29/2021, petitioner Albert Cox shall SHOW CAUSE in writing why this case should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit a completed pauper application and for failure to inform the Court of his current address as required by L.R. 11.1 and L.R. 41.3.1. Payment of the $5.00 filing fee or submission of a properly completed pauper application by this deadline will satisfy the Courts Show Cause Order. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN A RECOMMENDATION THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 3/30/2021.(caa) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe DOCUMENT: re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254). Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 3/16/2021. (jls) |
Filing 1 **DEFICIENT** PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Albert Cox. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(jls) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.