Padgett v. BruMar Mechanical Contractors, LLC
| Shea Padgett |
| BruMar Mechanical Contractors, LLC |
| 2:2021cv00408 |
| February 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Barry W Ashe |
| Dana Douglas |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Second Motion for Extension of Time to Plead re #1 Complaint as to BruMar Mechanical Contractors, LLC; answer due 4/30/2021. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 4/15/2021. (mm)
|
| Filing 10 EXPARTE/CONSENT Second MOTION for Extension of Time to Plead by BruMar Mechanical Contractors, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Schoen, Hunter) Modified text on 4/14/2021 (am). |
|
Filing 9
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld recused. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld on 3/29/2021. (NEF: Judge Douglas)(ajn)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: GRANTING #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint as to BruMar Mechanical Contractors, LLC answer due 4/16/2021. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 3/26/2021. (am)
|
| Filing 7 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer by BruMar Mechanical Contractors, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Schoen, Hunter) |
| Filing 6 **DEFICIENT**EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer by BruMar Mechanical Contractors, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Hunter Jacob Schoen added to party BruMar Mechanical Contractors, LLC(pty:dft).(Schoen, Hunter) Modified text on 3/26/2021 (am). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed; BruMar Mechanical Contractors, LLC served on 3/4/2021, answer due 3/25/2021. (Stiegler, Charles) Modified text on 3/5/2021 (am). |
| Filing 4 **DEFICIENT**SUMMONS Returned Executed; BruMar Mechanical Contractors, LLC served on 3/4/2021, answer due 3/25/2021. (Stiegler, Charles) Modified text on 3/4/2021 (am). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to BruMar Mechanical Contractors, LLC. (lt) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Barry W Ashe and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (go) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against BruMar Mechanical Contractors, LLC (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BLAEDC-8750155) filed by Shea Padgett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)Attorney Charles J. Stiegler added to party Shea Padgett(pty:pla).(Stiegler, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Padgett v. BruMar Mechanical Contractors, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BruMar Mechanical Contractors, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Lauren Lopresto Tafaro |
| Represented By: | Hunter Jacob Schoen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shea Padgett | |
| Represented By: | Charles J. Stiegler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
