Wright v. Louisiana State et al
| Robert Scott Wright |
| Louisiana State, Jake D Busby and Jonathan D Tynes |
| 2:2021cv00485 |
| March 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Martin LC Feldman |
| Michael North |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
SUMMONS Returned Executed; Jake D Busby served on 4/23/2021, answer due 5/14/2021; Louisiana State served on 4/23/2021, answer due 5/14/2021; Jonathan D Tynes served on 4/23/2021, answer due 5/14/2021. (Attachments: #1 Return, #2 Return)(sa)
|
|
Filing 10
Summons Issued as to Jake D Busby, Louisiana State, Jonathan D Tynes. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(caa)
|
|
Filing 9
PAUPER ORDER Granting Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with a partial payment of $0.00 and directing the remainder of filing fee be made from Prisoner Account as to Robert Scott Wright in monthly payments as set out in document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North on 3/24/2021. (cc: Warden, USM)(caa)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Preserve Evidence and Request for In-Camera Inspection by Robert Scott Wright. Motion(s) referred to Michael North. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(bwn)
|
|
Filing 7
EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Scott Wright. Motion(s) referred to Michael North. (sa)
|
|
Filing 6
COMPLAINT against Jake D Busby, Louisiana State, Jonathan D Tynes filed by Robert Scott Wright. (Attachments: #1 Original deficient Complaint, #2 Exhibits)(sa) (Main Document 6 replaced on 3/24/2021) (bwn).
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Complaint. Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 3/30/2021. (sbs)
|
|
Filing 4
Case transferred in from District of Louisiana Middle; Case Number 3:20-cv-00107. Electronic file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received (jls)
|
|
Filing 3
GENERAL ORDER: All pleadings and other papers filed under seal in civil and criminal actions shall be maintained under seal for thirty days following final disposition of the action. After that time, all sealed pleadings and other papers shall be placed in the case record unless a District Judge or Magistrate Judge, upon motion and for good cause shown, orders that the pleading or other paper be maintained under seal. The deadline for filing any motions regarding the unsealing of any document shall be within thirty days of the final disposition of any action and shall contain a concise statement of reasons for maintaining the pleading or other paper under seal. ATTENTION: If a motion to retain documents under seal is NOT filed, all documents shall be placed in the public case record, unless specifically identified in the attached General Order Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 7/8/2019. (KMW) [Transferred from lamd on 3/9/2021.]
|
|
Filing 2
Order Transferring Case to the Eastern District of Louisiana.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 3/5/2021. (KMW) [Transferred from lamd on 3/9/2021.]
|
|
***Set CASE REFERRED Flag (PPS) (KMW) [Transferred from lamd on 3/9/2021.]
|
|
Filing 1
**DEFICIENT** COMPLAINT against Jake D Busby, State Of Louisiana, Jonathan D. Tynes, filed by Robert Scott Wright. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(KMW) [Transferred from lamd on 3/9/2021.] Modified text on 3/9/2021 (sbs).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
