Meadows v. Vannoy et al
Billy Meadows and Billy Ray Meadows |
Darrel Vannoy |
Attorney General State of Louisiana |
2:2021cv00741 |
April 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Dana Douglas |
Susie Morgan |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 5 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Billy Ray Meadows. Motion(s) referred to Dana Douglas. (Attachments: #1 Original IFP)(bm) |
Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Billy Ray Meadows. (Attachments: #1 Original Petition, #2 Original Memo in Support, #3 Original Exhibit A, #4 Transmittal Letter, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(bm) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254). Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 5/4/2021. (pp) |
Filing 2 **DEFICIENT** EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Billy Meadows. Motion(s) referred to Dana Douglas. (pp) |
Filing 1 **DEFICIENT** PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Billy Meadows. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit, (4) Civil Cover Sheet)(pp) Modified on 4/13/2021 (bwn). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.