Venequip, S.A. v. Louisiana Machinery Co., LLC
Defendant: Louisiana Machinery Co., LLC
Petitioner: Venequip, S.A.
Respondent: Louisiana Machinery Co., LLC doing business as Louisiana Cat or Louisiana Rents
Case Number: 2:2021mc02090
Filed: November 11, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Janis van Meerveld
Referring Judge: Wendy B Vitter
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Aurelia Williams of Order granting 1782 Application [R. Doc. 6] and related subpoenas served on Louisiana Machinery Company, LLC d/b/a Louisiana Cat or Louisiana Rents on November 29, 2021. (Paschal, Caroline)
November 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Granting #1 Application for Order to Issue Subpoenas for the Taking of Depositions and the Production of Documents, without prejudice to any argument Louisiana Cat may raise in challenging the subpoenas. Venequip shall be allowed to serve Louisiana Cat with the proposed subpoenas. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Venequip shall serve a copy of this order along with the subpoenas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld on 11/19/2021. (ajn)
November 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Caroline Hogan Paschal of Application for Order and Order of Referral served on Louisiana Machinery Company, LLC d/b/a Louisiana Cat or Louisiana Rents on November 18, 2021. (Paschal, Caroline)
November 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF REFERRAL: In accordance with Rule 71 of the Local Rules of this Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Venequip, S.A.'s #1 Application for Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782(a) Permitting Venequip, S.A. to Issue Subpoenas for the Taking of Depositions and the Production of Documents From Louisiana Machinery Company, LLC d/b/a Louisiana Cat or Louisiana Rents for Use in Swiss Proceeding (R. Doc. 1) is referred to Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld for determination.Counsel for Venequip, S.A. is directed to serve a copy of this Order on Louisiana Machinery Company, LLC d/b/a Louisiana Cat or Louisiana Rents. Signed by Judge Wendy B Vitter on 11/17/2021.(jeg) Modified text on 11/18/2021 (mmv).
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Miscellaneous Case Petition. **1.Filing attorney did not properly format the pdf of the subpoena forms. The pdf should not have the purple boxes nor the 3 red buttons at the bottom. When using a FORM, fill in the applicable fields then click the red PRINT button at the bottom to print the document to pdf format. Clerk has taken corrective action. 2. Document lists counsel Daniel Pulecio-Boek and Nicole Silver for a party in this action who have not been admitted to practice in this court. Any party not appearing in proper person must be represented by a member of the bar of this court (L.R. 83.2.4). Please see Local Rule 83.2.2 for this court's Procedures for Admission and Local Rule 83.2.5 for Visiting Attorneys to appear and participate Pro Hac Vice. Any future filings which list attorneys not admitted pursuant to LR 83.2.2 or 83.2.5 will not be accepted and will be deemed deficient.** (jeg)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Wendy B Vitter and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (aj)
November 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Miscellaneous Case Petition of Venequip, S.A. Request for Judicial Assistance as to Application for Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782(a) Permitting Venequip, S.A. to Issue Subpoenas for the Taking of Depositions and the Production of Documents from Louisiana Machinery Company, LLC (Filing fee $ 49 receipt number ALAEDC-9104259) filed by Venequip, S.A.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A - Subpoena to Louisiana Machinery, #3 Exhibit B - Subpoena to Corporate Rep of Louisiana Machinery, #4 Exhibit C - Declaration of Mickael Besse, #5 Exhibit D - Louisiana Machinery Secretary of State Information, #6 Exhibit E - Louisiana CAT Locations, #7 Proposed Order, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Kerry James Miller added to party Venequip, S.A.(pty:pet).(Miller, Kerry) (Attachment 2 replaced on 11/12/2021) (jeg). (Attachment 3 replaced on 11/12/2021) (jeg). Modified on 11/17/2021 (jeg).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Venequip, S.A. v. Louisiana Machinery Co., LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Venequip, S.A.
Represented By: Kerry James Miller
Represented By: Caroline Hogan Paschal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Louisiana Machinery Co., LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Louisiana Machinery Co., LLC doing business as Louisiana Cat or Louisiana Rents
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?