Chiverton v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
| James Chiverton |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 2:2022cv00577 |
| March 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Nannette Jolivette Brown |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 3/31/2022, answer due 5/31/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Affidavit)(Gahagan, Michael) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Attachments: #1 Summons to US Atty General, #2 Summons to US Attorney's Office)(jls) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (go) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9263626) filed by James Chiverton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit)Attorney Michael Wayne Gahagan added to party James Chiverton(pty:pla).(Gahagan, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
