United States of America v. Housing Authority of New Orleans et al
| United States of America |
| Housing Authority of New Orleans, Columbia Residential, LLC, HRI Properties, LLC, McCormack Baron Salazar, Inc., KBK Enterprises, LLC, Enterprise Community Partners, Inc., Providence Community Housing and L+M Development Partners, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv03568 |
| September 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Lance M Africk |
| Donna Phillips Currault |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 3601 Fair Housing Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER re #5 Consent Order; ORDERED that the matter is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the order. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 11/16/2022.(blg)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Enroll as Counsel of Record for Attorney Jerry Anthony Beatmann, Jr for McCormack Baron Salazar, Inc. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 10/05/2022. (ko)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 Motion to Approve Consent Judgment. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 10/05/2022. (ko)
|
| Filing 4 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Enroll as Counsel of Record by McCormack Baron Salazar, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Jerry Anthony Beatmann, Jr added to party McCormack Baron Salazar, Inc.(pty:dft).(Beatmann, Jerry) Modified text on 10/5/2022 (ko). |
| Filing 3 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Approve and Enter Proposed Consent Judgment by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Parties' Fully Executed Consent Order, #2 Appendix A to Consent Order - Defendants' Property Associations, #3 Appendix B to Consent Order - Bienville Basin Retrofit Plan, #4 Appendix C to Consent Order - Columbia Parc Retrofit Plan, #5 Appendix C.1 to Consent Order - Columbia Parc Routes, #6 Appendix D to Consent Order - Faubourg Lafitte Non-Senior Retrofit Plan, #7 Appendix E to Consent Order - Faubourg Lafitte Senior Retrofit Plan, #8 Appendix F to Consent Order - Fischer Senior Retrofit Plan, #9 Appendix G to Consent Order - Guste Retrofit Plan, #10 Appendix H to Consent Order - Harmony Oaks Retrofit Plan, #11 Appendix H.1 to Consent Order - Harmony Oaks Routes, #12 Appendix I to Consent Order - Marrero Commons Retrofit Plan, #13 Appendix I.1 to Consent Order - Marrero Commons Routes, #14 Appendix J to Consent Order - River Garden I Retrofit Plan, #15 Appendix K to Consent Order - River Garden II Retrofit Plan, #16 Appendix L to Consent Order - Notice to Tenants, #17 Appendix M to Consent Order - Survey Protocol, #18 Appendix N to Consent Order - Property Survey Report Protocol, #19 Appendix O to Consent Order - Notice of Retrofits, #20 Appendix P to Consent Order - Notice to Potential Victims, #21 Appendix Q to Consent Order - List of Organizations, #22 Appendix R to Consent Order - Release, #23 Appendix S to Consent Order - Acknowledgement of Receipt, #24 Appendix T to Consent Order - Certification of Training)(Bryant, Aurora) Modified on 10/3/2022 (ko). |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Lance M Africk and Magistrate Judge Donna Phillips Currault. (go) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filed on behalf of USA - Filing Fee not required) filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Aurora Rose Bryant added to party United States of America(pty:pla).(Bryant, Aurora) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
