Jackson v. Astrid et al
Chavez Jovante Jackson |
Dr. Astrid and Andrea Blake |
2:2023cv00389 |
January 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Lance M Africk |
Karen Wells Roby |
Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDERED that plaintiff's application is DENIED because plaintiff has not provided answers to the questions on the pauper application necessary to evaluate his pauper status nor has he submitted "a certified copy of the trust fund account (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint" as required by 28 U.S.C. 1915 (a)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 3/13/2023.(lb) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Complaint, Terminate Motions. Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 2/22/2023. (ss) |
Filing 2 **DEFICIENT** EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Chavez Jovante Jackson. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (ss) QC'd on 2/15/2023 (aj). |
Filing 1 **DEFICIENT** COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Chavez J Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ss) QC'd on 2/15/2023 (aj). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.