Jones v. Allied Trust Insurance Company
| Christopher Jones |
| Allied Trust Insurance Company |
| Hurricane Ida Program Administrator |
| 2:2023cv02121 |
| June 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Carl J Barbier |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Allied Trust Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Allied Trust Holdings, LLC for Allied Trust Insurance Company (Klotz, Donald) Modified on 6/22/2023 (cg). |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Allied Trust Insurance Company.Attorney Donald Robert Klotz, Jr added to party Allied Trust Insurance Company(pty:dft).(Klotz, Donald) |
Filing 3
HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 10/25/22.(gec)
|
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Carl J Barbier and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (kls) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Allied Trust Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9991235) filed by Christopher Jones. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Kevin P. Riche added to party Christopher Jones(pty:selreq).(Riche, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
