Vedrenne v. Social Security Administration
| Penny M. Vedrenne |
| Social Security Administration |
| U.S. Attorney Eastern District of Louisiana -SSA |
| 2:2024cv01580 |
| June 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Jane Triche Milazzo |
| Michael North |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Karl E. Osterhout. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North on 6/20/2024. (Attachments: #1 PHV Notice) (cs)
|
| Filing 3 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jane Triche Milazzo and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (kls) |
| Filing 2 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-10575521) by Penny M. Vedrenne. Motion(s) referred to Michael North. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Consent for Electronic Filing, #3 Affidavit, #4 Proposed Order)(Bourgeois, Loyd) Modified text on 6/20/2024 (cs). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ALAEDC-10575520) filed by Penny M. Vedrenne. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Loyd J. Bourgeois, Jr added to party Penny M. Vedrenne(pty:pla).(Bourgeois, Loyd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
