Stiebing v. Social Security Administration
| Douglas G. Stiebing |
| Social Security Administration |
| U.S. Attorney Eastern District of Louisiana -SSA |
| 2:2024cv01772 |
| July 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Lance M Africk |
| Michael North |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Edward A Wicklund. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North on 7/20/2024. (Attachments: #1 Notice) (lag)
|
| Filing 3 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Lance M Africk and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (Ingraham, Christina) |
| Filing 2 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-10611153) by Douglas G. Stiebing. Motion(s) referred to Michael North. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order)(Misko, Benjamin) Modified text/refer on 7/17/2024 (meb). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ALAEDC-10611129) filed by Douglas G. Stiebing. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeal Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Benjamin M. Misko added to party Douglas G. Stiebing(pty:pla).(Misko, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
