Cook v. Social Security Administration
| Ivy Cook |
| Social Security Administration |
| U.S. Attorney Eastern District of Louisiana -SSA |
| 2:2024cv02048 |
| August 21, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Jane Triche Milazzo |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 9/17/2024.(pp)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 8/26/2024. (pp)
|
| Filing 3 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jane Triche Milazzo and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (cmi) |
| Filing 2 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ivy Cook. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (Attachments: #1 Informa Pauperis, #2 Proposed Order)(Meunier, Adam) Modified event/text on 8/22/2024 (amj). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration (In Forma Pauperis status requested) filed by Ivy Cook. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons SSA, #3 Summons Attorney General, #4 Summons US Attorney)Attorney Adam Meunier added to party Ivy Cook(pty:pla).(Meunier, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
