Bosley v. Allain

Case Number: 3:2005cv01023
Filed: August 12, 2005
Court: Louisiana Middle District Court
Office: Baton Rouge Office
Referring Judge: Stephen C. Riedlinger
Presiding Judge: Ralph E. Tyson
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 28, 2011 71 Opinion or Order of the Court RULING granting 67 Motion in Limine filed by defendant. Evidence, stated herein, shall be excluded from the trial of this matter. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 4/27/2011. (PJH)
March 24, 2011 64 Opinion or Order of the Court RULING: The 62 MOTION for Leave to File Reply Memorandum in Support of Second Motion for Summary Judgment by All Defendants is granted. The 55 MOTION for benched trial by O'Neal Bosley is denied. The motion by defendants for summary judgment (doc. 54) is DENIED only insofar as defendants seek summary judgment dismissing the Fourth Amendment claim, however, IT 15 ORDERED that plaintiff shall have ten days from the filing of this order in which to set forth evidence to meet his burden in opposing defendants' motion for summary judgment (doc. 54) insofar as it pertains to plaintiff's claim for punitive damages. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 03/24/2011. (NLT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bosley v. Allain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?